Home
Bean
beanalby
.:::
  Viewing 0 - 5  
Bean [userpic]
Lawrence Lessig on Corruption

There's an interview with Creative Commons founder Lawrence Lessig, where he makes a great analogy about the problem with lobyists:

So I don’t want a world where there are no lobbyists — I think lobbyists are essential. I think the message of lobbyists and the training of lobbyists is essential. Just like I think that what lawyers do before the Supreme Court is essential. But just as I think everybody would think it weird if a lawyer before the Supreme Court would send $100,000 to the Justice Roberts Retirement Fund or $100,000 to the Renovate Justice Roberts’s Office Fund, I think we better recognize there’s something perverse about a member of Congress having one of the people who is trying to persuade him what the right answer is raise $100,000 for his campaign. That’s the link we’ve got to break.

Couldn't agree more.

Tags:
Current Mood: curious curious
Bean [userpic]
OUR torture is ok.

Some of us might be worried that the "alternative interrogation techniques" our government is using, which has been used to torture people in years past, might be...torture. Well our government has let us know that it's not torture, because our waterboarding was subject to "strict limitations".

And he argued that what the CIA did bears "no resemblance" to what torturers in time past have done. "There's been a lot of discussion in the public about historical uses of waterboarding," he said. But the "only thing in common is the use of water," he said.

The Spanish and Japanese use of "water torture," he said, "involved the forced consumption of a mass amount of water." Asked by a Republican whether Bradbury was aware of any "modern use" of waterboarding that involved the "lungs filling with water," Bradbury said no.


Well, I feel totally better now. Here I thought we were torturing people, but I guess when we do it, it's ok because it's not really torture! *Phew*.

...of course, there's no way we can verify this, since the CIA destroyed the videotapes of interrogations. But I'm sure there was nothing imporant on those tapes anyway, otherwise they wouldn't have been destroyed.


Right?

As a side note, at least with the presedential race, no matter who wins (McCain, Clinton, Obama), we'll definitely have an anti-torture president (although Clinton previously supported it).

UPDATE: Ok nevermind, as [info]trygve pointed out, apparently McCain vorted against a ban on waterboarding. Hrm. I want to see more details on this or at least hear McCain's side, I know voting on legislation can be packed with caveats and ulterior motives. Speaking in October 2007, McCain said that waterboarding "is not a complicated procedure. It is torture." I'd be shocked (and lose all respect for him) if he pulled a hard 180 on such a serious issue.

update update: In a statement, McCain said the measure goes too far in applying military standards to intelligence agencies and maintained that existing law already forbids waterboarding. "Staging a mock execution by including the misperception of drowining is a clear violation,'' he said." Hmm.

Tags:
Current Mood: angry angry
Bean [userpic]
Corrupt government grants immunity to corrupt ISPs

[info]tryvge has an entry going in to as much detail as I could hope to about the situation. Essentially:

  • Telecoms perform illegal wiretaps for government
  • public finds out about said wiretaps, gets angry
  • government grants immunity to telecoms for said wiretaps


Does anyone else see a problem with this? What the heck happened to by the people, for the people?

I don't know how anyone with a shred of a conscience could vote Nay for this bill. And Republicans opposed it, 0-49.

I'm ashamed of our government.

And as [info]eirias pointed out, the voting on this bill by the presidential candidates:

McCain: No (grant immunity for illegal activities)
Obama: Yes (deny immunity for illegal activities)
Clinton: Not present ( argh! )

This is a big plus for Obama in my book.

Tags:
Current Mood: angry angry
Bean [userpic]
Political Rhetoric

I'm amazed that even as he resigns, Mitt Romney is still spewing the same political rhetoric.

"If I fight on in my campaign, all the way to the convention, I would forestall the launch of a national campaign and make it more likely that Senator Clinton or Obama would win. And in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign, be a part of aiding a surrender to terror," Romney told the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington. (emphasis mine)

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1710864,00.html

A surrender to terror? Yes, we should all be afraid of a democratic nomination, because that means the TERRISTS win! I'm not intending this as any kind of "democratic support" statement, but do people actually believe this crap? Is anyone really suckered in by this blatant fear mongering?

Tags:
Bean [userpic]
Freedom is about Authority

"Freedom is not a concept in which people can do anything they want, be anything they can be. Freedom is about authority. Freedom is about the willingness of every single human being to cede to lawful authority a great deal of discretion about what you do."

-- Rudy Guiliani's 1994 speech on crime

Wow. I really hope that man doesn't become president.

Tags:
Current Mood: anxious anxious
  Viewing 0 - 5